Dataset
patent-legal-knowledge-graph
Repository layout details generated by PatentHubLayoutV2 for JusticeDAO's patent and legal knowledge graph. The metadata references the CFR Title 37 2024 annual edition under a U.S. public-domain license and is tagged patent-legal-v2.0.0.
Data preview
Dataset card
The Patent Legal Knowledge Graph is a public-domain repository layout released by JusticeDAO under CC0 1.0, designed to model patents and related legal records as a joinable knowledge graph. The card describes schema and routing metadata only, with no measured size or sample rows disclosed.
What this dataset contains
The release packages layout metadata for a patent and legal knowledge graph tagged patent-legal-v2.0.0 under the patent-legal-hf-layout/v2 schema, generated by PatentHubLayoutV2. Each data row that projects public text or index structure is required to join to a public source CID via a source_cid field and a stable record_id, while index and graph configurations bind shard CIDs in their routing tables. The repository is described as layout metadata only; the official publication is treated as a separate operator-approved action. No row-level patent, claim, or party data is shown in the facts provided.
Structure and fields
The schema reference is patent-legal-hf-layout/v2, with joins anchored on record_id, source_cid, and shard CIDs declared in routing tables. Machine-readable joins are documented in manifest.jsonld at the root of the release. The card does not enumerate additional columns, primary keys beyond record_id, or split definitions, so field-level detail beyond these identifiers is not available.
How analysts use it
The knowledge graph framing implies use cases such as mapping patent-to-publication and patent-to-party relationships and tracing each record back to a public source CID for provenance. The explicit binding of source_cid and record_id supports auditability, which is relevant for funds tracking litigation exposure, prior-art landscapes, or technology-transfer signals around portfolio companies. Given that the facts provide no measured coverage, update cadence, or downstream publication, any production use would require verifying the operator-approved official edition.
Documentation & references 1
Discussion
Questions or observations about this dataset? Join the conversation on X.
No comments yet. Start the conversation on X.